The End of an Era of Accessibility

Hoo boy. Today was a day of blows for me. First, I got some news at work today, which I will not delineate at this time. It was an honor, yet it was a blow because I truly had different goals. As I was reeling from this dramatic change in direction and focus this news brings me, I got an incredibly upsetting e-mail. The Captioned Media Program is closing its doors forever as of March 30th. I've put out some feelers to find out exactly why, but I have not yet received confirmation. If any of you have any information on this, please do share! We, the community, need to know what happened that caused us to lose this valuable resource.

This news put me in a nostalgic frame of mind. The very first captioned *anything* I ever saw was a Captioned Films for the Deaf reel showing of Disney's Freaky Friday (the original with Jodie Foster, mind you, not the crappy recent re-make.) The teachers herded all of us up and ushered us off to the multi-purpose room. Up to this time, TV or movies held little interest for me, except for cartoons. I still love Disney and Warner cartoons to this day, and I proudly own all 4 Looney Tunes Golden Collection DVD sets. Back to that fateful day eons ago... I was transfixed. I finally understood what all those moving mouths were saying, and it was interesting. I still remember the opening blue/red frames proclaiming "Captioned Films for the Deaf" and the white subtitles. I got to see a few more Disney movies, including The Parent Trap and I think Herbie, all shown via reel and projector, with that same blue/red opening. When I became older, I realized I'd experienced something very much a part of deaf culture; after all, who among us has not heard the stories about reel CFD movies being shown in the clubs and schools decades ago? As I became older, I saw even more CFD films, all reels, but they were not as much fun as the Disney movies. Instead they dealt with mundane topics like driver's education, sex education, physics, and so on. One of my favorites, though, was the old black-and-white version of A Tale of Two Cities. Now *that* was a classic! I can still picture Madame Defarge's face contorted in fury as she denounced the Marquis St. Evremonde, not realizing said marquis was standing in front of her. At Gally, I saw some CFV (now Captioned Films and Videos) videotapes in classes. When I started teaching, I saw CFV eventually become CMP. I used their stuff a few times, but it was, um, not the best. A few years ago, a dear colleague of mine contacted me and asked me if I wanted to become an evaluator for CMP. I was surprised because I wasn't using their services and I didn't know that much about it except via personal experience as a student. But I'm open to new experiences, so I accepted. One of the best decisions in my life.

I was put in touch with several people at CMP in order to do a field evaluation in my area of expertise and to plan for a trip to Hartford. I found the study to be a very tall order, being completely unfamiliar with the current catalog, but I managed to come up with an assessment of strengths and gaps in the current collection - trying my very best. They were so supportive during the whole process. Much to my surprise and delight, I discovered that CMP had overhauled its offerings significantly. There were few titles older than five years, and those that were were appropriate for the most part. The titles were more aligned to national standards and to appropriate grade levels than they had been a few years previously. I resolved to start incorporating CMP titles more in my teaching, and sent a glowing evaluation, along with a honest assessment of areas that were still lacking or could be strengthened. I became excited and nervous about the sojourn to the American School for the Deaf. Hartford was amazing. I attended the opening ceremonies for CMP with no real idea as to what to expect. The next three days were a whirlwind of evaluating, socializing, and learning new things. I was inspired by the warmth I felt from everyone and the spirit of teamwork, cooperation and flexibility. They are wonderful. The whole process was incredibly complicated and required so much preparation before we started evaluating, but it went smoothly with incredible efficiency. I left, richer for the experience, hoping to be invited back for the next time, and awed by the Captioned Media Program. I, over the next two years, told some people to check the titles out, praised CMP, discussed it with my library manager and got her interested in hosting an evaluation here, checked some titles out myself, and continued evaluating titles at home. It was so cool to see titles I'd recommended appear in the catalog! I felt like our hard work was having a nationwide impact. When I was invited back to Ogden last summer, I was thrilled and eagerly looked forward to it. The Utah School for the Deaf proved to me once again how special this program is. I was inspired all over again by the people present and the work that we are doing. It felt like a reunion and I met more wonderful people and gained even more respect for CMP.

But Utah was very different. The "big kahuna" was noticeably absent, even though he was in town. His wife stayed behind in Spartanburg, unlike Hartford and apparently unlike any other time previously. (We found out later she stayed behind to work on saving the program.) The opening night, in the middle of the festive reunion greetings, bore ill tidings. CMP's budget had been slashed to half of what it has had and it had been ordered to provide video descriptions for the blind. As we blinked in confusion, he explained that while we can see someone closing a cupboard door on film, a blind person just hears something close and has no idea what it is. Video descriptions would voice over visual cues for the edification of blind viewers (now that's an oxymoron. Blind viewer? *grin*). For example, suppose you see a dishy blonde walking up to a cupboard, opening it, taking a glass out, and closing the cupboard. One might hear the patter of feet, the clink of the glass hitting the counter, and the gentle slam of the door closing. But what the heck just happened?? Video descriptions would fill this gap. A grim statistic - only 10% of educational media is currently voluntarily captioned. It doesn't surprise me, since I've been responsible for placing orders for my area for a few years now, and yup. Very little out there is captioned. Hollywood's doing a better job of captioning than educators are??? *doink* What's wrong with this picture??? But I digress. So this decision was cutting back on access for us and our kind. Hm. He went on to describe how they were fighting this and appealing the US Depatment of Education decision. We were told no more home evaluations, all the libraries might close, maybe no mailing of tapes anymore due to the cost and moving the whole collection online, this might be the last biennial evaluation, a position was closed, and so on. Things looked frighteningly grim, and when I got home, I blogged about it here urging action. CMP has a number of libraries across the nation that house and mail out videos and DVDs, including one at my school. I heard a few weeks ago that all the libraries were going to close, except for the one at the Oklahoma School for the Deaf. It'd house all titles. I haven't been contacted to do any work since last summer and the website currently announces the change in mission to include video descriptions, but at least the program was still going. And the info I got last summer did not appear to spell the end of CMP. Today's e-mail changed that.

CFD had to change to survive. But it still served a vital purpose, and shutting it down and/or crippling it is a major mistake. We *still* need it, in spite of the advent of captioning done by the private sector. The private sector is NOT fulfilling its responsibilities, and since the government is not enforcing ADA regulations, this is a vital program for us. I was so upset, I got on AIM and set my away message to "VERY UPSET! CMP is closing its doors forever!" A friend got in touch, asking what was up. I filled her in and she said we have to fight it. I gloomily told her it was too late and she said, "We can't think like that!" She's right. Even if it's an exercise in futility, we gotta fight to the very end. Contact your congressional representative, the US Department of Education, and the NAD. (Contact links are in the post I referred to earlier. If you don't want to click to see the earlier post - www.house.gov, www.senate.gov, and www.ed.gov are starting points where you can get the contact info you need.)

UPDATE 3.1.07: CMP is *not* closing its doors. For my retraction, go here. For further info on CMP, go here.

Profanity in DeafBlogLand

This is something that seems to be increasing exponentially, and the first instance I recall appeared in January! So we're talking a month, a month and a half ago. I'm growing concerned. For the record, I have no issue with profanity at all. I enjoy using it at appropriate times and marvel at how creative we can be in any language (the French are mighty creative and colorful in their vulgarity!). I believe that in order to master a language wholly one should be able to swear in the language, even if one chooses never to do so for personal or religious reasons.
But I digress...

Aidan Mack posted an open letter to the DeafRead.com editors here regarding the issue of profanity. It raises some interesting points.

One of the major "red flags" this poses for me is the issue of censorship. Censorship is a slippery slope, and once we start down that hill, there is every risk of snowballing and censoring unnecessarily. (Banning Huck Finn from school libraries, anyone?) I do *not* recommend that DeafRead, nor any other editor begin censoring entries.

My comment is copied and pasted here in its entirety. Thoughts? Comments? Please feel free to respond, members of the Teeming Millions - we need to mull this over and talk about this topic.

I agree with you both, Aidan and IamMine. I, too, work with students, and I'm now concerned about recommending DeafRead to them because of the profanity in what seems like an ever-growing number of entries.

However, there is the issue of freedom of speech/expression, and censorship isn't the way to go.

I personally have no issue with profanity and have been known to use it in my personal life. However, I'm mindful of who is around when I use it, and I never ever use it with people in grades 12 or below or younger than 18... And I refuse to use it in the blog I maintain that's
syndicated by DeafRead, because I want it to be appropriate for all interested parties, which include students and those who do not appreciate profanity. Those who choose to use it on the Internet are definitely well within their rights to do so and they are availing themselves of a wonderful part of the English language (in my opinion), but they run the risk that their entries become inappropriate for a segment of their potential audience. This means their thoughts are not reaching all of their intended audience.

As for what DeafRead can do... I think the idea of sections is intriguing. However, it would be a lot of work for both the editors and readers. As a reader, I'd far prefer to keep the current format with everything on the front page. I think we run the risk of missing entries just because we wouldn't click on every single section. I vote to leave it as is. But maybe they could code the ones with profanity somehow, maybe with a red flag? ;) That would warn parents and other interested parties.

I believe the responsibility ultimately lies with all of us in DeafBlogLand. We bloggers/vloggers need to be mindful of how we present ourselves to our audience, and if we choose to use profanity, it should be a conscious decision, made with the awareness that we are closing ourselves off from part of our potential audience. But we *should* all strive for respectful and open-dialogue entries. We commenters should keep the same things in mind when we comment on entries. Bloggers/vloggers CAN control comments, though - and SHOULD when comments are disrespectful or attack people/groups, in my opinion. In
WordPress, one can remove ANY comment, with or without moderation. Blogger requires moderation, though. People with Blogger accounts can moderate comments and refuse to allow disrespectful comments to be published. Again, we, as individuals, all bear the responsibility. I don't think dumping it on DeafRead is the way to go, but they should be aware that there are concerns.

Thanks, Aidan, for raising this issue!

***Notes: I wrote this last Thursday (I think) and attempted to post this via email, but Blogger wouldn't post it simply because they were forcing everybody to upgrade to the new version, and I didn't have a chance to deal with it till now. Grr. Second note - the info about Blogger above is now inaccurate. Blogger will allow the blog owner to delete *any* comment with, or without, moderation.